I hope anyone else looking for this info finds it …
If I change the buffer size on my soundcard from 512 to 1024 does that effect the sounds quality on export? From my search it says that it does not. My computer is a beast and I stick with 128 samples because it’s an unnoticeable amount of latency for me at 4.6 milliseconds. In 2017, the year of this writing, my estimation is that only the best computers available should even consider a buffer size of 64 samples. How to Achieve Low Audio Latency While Recording My problem is that I am trying to record guitar but I I’m using the Focusrite USB audio driver as the audio driver. Buffer size/recording audio Post by Dkidaudio77 » Fri 9:20 pm I currently have able ton live lite 10 that came along with the scarlett. If you change the settings to 512 and 48 kHz, however, it’ll 
For example, if you have your buffer size set to 256 and your sample rate at 48 kHz, divide those two and you’ll get 5.3 ms.
Just divide the buffer size by the number of samples per second (sample rate). Reducing Latency, Clicks, and Pops While Recording The buffer size can be set in the audio preferences of your music application (as shown in the screenshots If you want to set an in-between number suitable for most recording and mixing duties, 256 or 512 will suffice. Thus, a buffer size of 1024 is more suitable. Optimizing Audio Settings for KOMPLETE AUDIO 1 / 2 … If I cut my sample buffer in half to 128 samples – I would save about 3ms of latency or approximately 3ft of distance between me and my monitor. By the way, we’re talking about live performance here, not recording which should be done slightly differently. 
This is why I personally use a buffer size of 256 and sample rate of 44.1KHz.
0 kommentar(er)
